It’s a clever idea, however I don’t think it’s wise to put retired items back in game. I think it would make trade value go down for certain items as they slowly, but surely, become more commonly found. (despite the argument that it wouldn’t, I politely disagree.)
People work hard to trade for/ or earn in the past, retired items. I think that work would be invalidated by this system.
This is only my opinion, and I don’t discredit your clever ideas. I do acknowledge it is a smart and cool concept, just not something I necessarily agree with.
Quick additional note: I agree with Pumpkin on the aspect of this being a thing done with only quest/scavenger items. Game items sound fun too, but those can go for a lot (particularly the costumes and fx) and I wouldn’t want the value going down on those.
If this were done only with quest and scavenger items, no host/game stuff, I’d be on board with the idea.
@Tomorrow No worries, it’s all good. Yes, this entire concept is a great idea and very fun to think about/entertain. It will keep players busy year-round, especially the collectors like myself.
I approve and second any variation of these ideas in this thread, with the one caveat that nothing from 2008-2009 be re-released. Please consider this VFK! :D
Comments
People work hard to trade for/ or earn in the past, retired items. I think that work would be invalidated by this system.
This is only my opinion, and I don’t discredit your clever ideas. I do acknowledge it is a smart and cool concept, just not something I necessarily agree with.
Quick additional note: I agree with Pumpkin on the aspect of this being a thing done with only quest/scavenger items. Game items sound fun too, but those can go for a lot (particularly the costumes and fx) and I wouldn’t want the value going down on those.
If this were done only with quest and scavenger items, no host/game stuff, I’d be on board with the idea.